Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs web-vitals
PixiJS vs web-vitals: who uses which
web-vitals is on more sites: 25,534 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 7.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | web-vitals |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 6,745 |
| .br in Brazil | 12 | 7,224 |
| .ar in Argentina | 4 | 6,933 |
| .de in Germany | 175 | 593 |
| .me on .me | 13 | 571 |
| .net on .net | 107 | 177 |
| .mx in Mexico | 3 | 255 |
| .jp in Japan | 98 | 154 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or web-vitals?
web-vitals is on more sites: 25,534 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 7.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and web-vitals together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or web-vitals as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.