Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs Web Components Polyfills
PixiJS vs Web Components Polyfills: who uses which
Web Components Polyfills is on more sites: 44,489 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 12.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | Web Components Polyfills |
|---|---|---|
| .pl in Poland | 65 | 10,381 |
| .de in Germany | 175 | 9,100 |
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 7,098 |
| .org on .org | 71 | 2,120 |
| .ru on .ru | 48 | 1,395 |
| .it in Italy | 147 | 1,192 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 36 | 1,235 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 46 | 1,136 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or Web Components Polyfills?
Web Components Polyfills is on more sites: 44,489 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 12.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and Web Components Polyfills together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or Web Components Polyfills as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.