Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs Workbox
PixiJS vs Workbox: who uses which
Workbox is on more sites: 8,641 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 2.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | Workbox |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 3,377 |
| .de in Germany | 175 | 764 |
| .it in Italy | 147 | 766 |
| .org on .org | 71 | 397 |
| .fr in France | 73 | 278 |
| .net on .net | 107 | 161 |
| .uk in the UK | 51 | 184 |
| .pl in Poland | 65 | 120 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or Workbox?
Workbox is on more sites: 8,641 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 2.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and Workbox together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or Workbox as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.