Home / Technologies / PJAX vs Socket.IO
PJAX vs Socket.IO: who uses which
PJAX is on more sites: 24,765 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 2.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PJAX | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 10,606 | 4,748 |
| .ru on .ru | 1,313 | 285 |
| .cn on .cn | 1,141 | 58 |
| .org on .org | 712 | 376 |
| .net on .net | 473 | 558 |
| .br in Brazil | 204 | 740 |
| .de in Germany | 495 | 137 |
| .ir on .ir | 554 | 19 |
36 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PJAX or Socket.IO?
PJAX is on more sites: 24,765 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 2.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PJAX and Socket.IO together?
36 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PJAX or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.