Home / Technologies / PJAX vs vanilla-lazyload
PJAX vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 24,765 for PJAX, about 1.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PJAX | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 10,606 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 1,313 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 712 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 473 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 435 | 957 |
| .cn on .cn | 1,141 | 243 |
| .de in Germany | 495 | 885 |
| .fr in France | 317 | 740 |
610 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PJAX or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 24,765 for PJAX, about 1.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PJAX and vanilla-lazyload together?
610 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PJAX or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.