Home / Technologies / Porto vs SiteGround Optimizer
Porto vs SiteGround Optimizer: who uses which
SiteGround Optimizer is on more sites: 86,129 against 28,559 for Porto, about 3.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Porto | SiteGround Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 11,542 | 46,793 |
| .org on .org | 546 | 6,939 |
| .uk in the UK | 750 | 5,919 |
| .it in Italy | 1,115 | 4,379 |
| .au in Australia | 458 | 3,377 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 507 | 1,955 |
| .net on .net | 521 | 1,635 |
| .de in Germany | 915 | 1,235 |
190 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Porto or SiteGround Optimizer?
SiteGround Optimizer is on more sites: 86,129 against 28,559 for Porto, about 3.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Porto and SiteGround Optimizer together?
190 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Porto or SiteGround Optimizer as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.