Home / Technologies / Prototype vs vanilla-lazyload
Prototype vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Prototype is on more sites: 134,096 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 3.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Prototype | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .de in Germany | 58,732 | 885 |
| .com on .com | 27,681 | 20,712 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 7,069 | 841 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 6,524 | 217 |
| .ru on .ru | 1,398 | 3,400 |
| .net on .net | 3,380 | 954 |
| .org on .org | 2,351 | 986 |
| .fi in Finland | 2,327 | 112 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Prototype or vanilla-lazyload?
Prototype is on more sites: 134,096 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 3.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Prototype and vanilla-lazyload together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Prototype or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.