Home / Technologies / React Router vs vanilla-lazyload
React Router vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 12,141 for React Router, about 3.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | React Router | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,011 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 90 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 298 | 986 |
| .de in Germany | 273 | 885 |
| .net on .net | 198 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 191 | 957 |
| .ca in Canada | 256 | 779 |
| .fr in France | 253 | 740 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, React Router or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 12,141 for React Router, about 3.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use React Router and vanilla-lazyload together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using React Router or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.