Home / Technologies / React vs vanilla-lazyload
React vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
React is on more sites: 3,838,136 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 85.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | React | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 2,265,321 | 20,712 |
| .org on .org | 204,043 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 139,280 | 957 |
| .de in Germany | 98,914 | 885 |
| .net on .net | 88,827 | 954 |
| .au in Australia | 64,293 | 471 |
| .br in Brazil | 58,603 | 303 |
| .ca in Canada | 55,058 | 779 |
85 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, React or vanilla-lazyload?
React is on more sites: 3,838,136 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 85.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use React and vanilla-lazyload together?
85 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using React or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.