Home / Technologies / RichRelevance vs Searchspring
RichRelevance vs Searchspring: who uses which
Searchspring is on more sites: 810 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 15.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | RichRelevance | Searchspring |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 9 | 576 |
| .au in Australia | 1 | 116 |
| .nz in New Zealand | 0 | 40 |
| .uk in the UK | 2 | 28 |
| .ca in Canada | 2 | 17 |
| .me on .me | 5 | 0 |
| .se in Sweden | 5 | 0 |
| .net on .net | 0 | 5 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, RichRelevance or Searchspring?
Searchspring is on more sites: 810 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 15.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use RichRelevance and Searchspring together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using RichRelevance or Searchspring as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.