Home / Technologies / RichRelevance vs Swiftype
RichRelevance vs Swiftype: who uses which
Swiftype is on more sites: 620 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 11.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | RichRelevance | Swiftype |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 9 | 347 |
| .org on .org | 0 | 64 |
| .edu on .edu | 0 | 31 |
| .uk in the UK | 2 | 15 |
| .io on .io | 0 | 16 |
| .au in Australia | 1 | 14 |
| .net on .net | 0 | 12 |
| .me on .me | 5 | 4 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, RichRelevance or Swiftype?
Swiftype is on more sites: 620 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 11.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use RichRelevance and Swiftype together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using RichRelevance or Swiftype as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.