Home / Technologies / RichRelevance vs Typesense
RichRelevance vs Typesense: who uses which
Typesense is on more sites: 1,429 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 27.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | RichRelevance | Typesense |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 9 | 864 |
| .ca in Canada | 2 | 163 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 2 | 50 |
| .pl in Poland | 1 | 38 |
| .de in Germany | 1 | 29 |
| .org on .org | 0 | 28 |
| .net on .net | 0 | 24 |
| .dk in Denmark | 4 | 16 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, RichRelevance or Typesense?
Typesense is on more sites: 1,429 against 53 for RichRelevance, about 27.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use RichRelevance and Typesense together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using RichRelevance or Typesense as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.