Home / Technologies / Salesforce Web-to-Lead vs Visitor Queue
Salesforce Web-to-Lead vs Visitor Queue: who uses which
Salesforce Web-to-Lead is on more sites: 2,549 against 1,275 for Visitor Queue, about 2.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Salesforce Web-to-Lead | Visitor Queue |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,322 | 893 |
| .org on .org | 146 | 11 |
| .uk in the UK | 58 | 93 |
| .au in Australia | 93 | 7 |
| .ca in Canada | 42 | 38 |
| .br in Brazil | 75 | 1 |
| .ru on .ru | 68 | 1 |
| .it in Italy | 51 | 9 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Salesforce Web-to-Lead or Visitor Queue?
Salesforce Web-to-Lead is on more sites: 2,549 against 1,275 for Visitor Queue, about 2.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Salesforce Web-to-Lead and Visitor Queue together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Salesforce Web-to-Lead or Visitor Queue as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.