Home / Technologies / Site Kit by Google vs WP Fastest Cache
Site Kit by Google vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
Site Kit by Google is on more sites: 2,080,530 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 6.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Site Kit by Google | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 985,288 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 67,130 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 76,817 | 13,724 |
| .org on .org | 78,394 | 8,230 |
| .uk in the UK | 61,447 | 6,855 |
| .it in Italy | 52,098 | 9,399 |
| .net on .net | 45,239 | 6,735 |
| .jp in Japan | 44,522 | 6,566 |
53,433 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Site Kit by Google or WP Fastest Cache?
Site Kit by Google is on more sites: 2,080,530 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 6.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Site Kit by Google and WP Fastest Cache together?
53,433 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Site Kit by Google or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.