Home / Technologies / Slick vs Socket.IO
Slick vs Socket.IO: who uses which
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 164.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Slick | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 795,050 | 4,748 |
| .jp in Japan | 94,724 | 39 |
| .de in Germany | 67,754 | 137 |
| .ru on .ru | 65,489 | 285 |
| .org on .org | 61,699 | 376 |
| .uk in the UK | 49,954 | 68 |
| .net on .net | 42,812 | 558 |
| .fr in France | 42,709 | 96 |
894 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Slick or Socket.IO?
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 164.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Slick and Socket.IO together?
894 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Slick or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.