Home / Technologies / Slick vs vanilla-lazyload
Slick vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 40.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Slick | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 795,050 | 20,712 |
| .jp in Japan | 94,724 | 212 |
| .ru on .ru | 65,489 | 3,400 |
| .de in Germany | 67,754 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 61,699 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 49,954 | 957 |
| .net on .net | 42,812 | 954 |
| .fr in France | 42,709 | 740 |
7,860 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Slick or vanilla-lazyload?
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 40.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Slick and vanilla-lazyload together?
7,860 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Slick or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.