Home / Technologies / Socket.IO vs Syncfusion
Socket.IO vs Syncfusion: who uses which
Socket.IO is on more sites: 11,013 against 1,403 for Syncfusion, about 7.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Socket.IO | Syncfusion |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,748 | 449 |
| .br in Brazil | 740 | 15 |
| .net on .net | 558 | 70 |
| .org on .org | 376 | 73 |
| .ru on .ru | 285 | 1 |
| .in in India | 176 | 32 |
| .se in Sweden | 24 | 170 |
| .io on .io | 154 | 16 |
3 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Socket.IO or Syncfusion?
Socket.IO is on more sites: 11,013 against 1,403 for Syncfusion, about 7.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Socket.IO and Syncfusion together?
3 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Socket.IO or Syncfusion as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.