Home / Technologies / Socket.IO vs Three.js
Socket.IO vs Three.js: who uses which
Three.js is on more sites: 25,096 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 2.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Socket.IO | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,748 | 11,782 |
| .de in Germany | 137 | 1,393 |
| .net on .net | 558 | 550 |
| .org on .org | 376 | 677 |
| .br in Brazil | 740 | 188 |
| .ru on .ru | 285 | 483 |
| .jp in Japan | 39 | 577 |
| .fr in France | 96 | 490 |
117 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Socket.IO or Three.js?
Three.js is on more sites: 25,096 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 2.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Socket.IO and Three.js together?
117 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Socket.IO or Three.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.