Home / Technologies / Socket.IO vs Turbolinks
Socket.IO vs Turbolinks: who uses which
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 3.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Socket.IO | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,748 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 376 | 2,993 |
| .net on .net | 558 | 757 |
| .br in Brazil | 740 | 528 |
| .ru on .ru | 285 | 740 |
| .de in Germany | 137 | 816 |
| .io on .io | 154 | 604 |
| .jp in Japan | 39 | 622 |
3 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Socket.IO or Turbolinks?
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 3.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Socket.IO and Turbolinks together?
3 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Socket.IO or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.