Home / Technologies / Socket.IO vs Underscore.js
Socket.IO vs Underscore.js: who uses which
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 111.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Socket.IO | Underscore.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,748 | 529,209 |
| .de in Germany | 137 | 73,489 |
| .org on .org | 376 | 55,195 |
| .fr in France | 96 | 36,310 |
| .it in Italy | 86 | 35,400 |
| .uk in the UK | 68 | 34,026 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 46 | 25,391 |
| .pl in Poland | 49 | 23,784 |
662 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Socket.IO or Underscore.js?
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 111.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Socket.IO and Underscore.js together?
662 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Socket.IO or Underscore.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.