Home / Technologies / Socket.IO vs web-vitals
Socket.IO vs web-vitals: who uses which
web-vitals is on more sites: 25,534 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 2.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Socket.IO | web-vitals |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,748 | 6,745 |
| .br in Brazil | 740 | 7,224 |
| .ar in Argentina | 25 | 6,933 |
| .net on .net | 558 | 177 |
| .de in Germany | 137 | 593 |
| .me on .me | 80 | 571 |
| .org on .org | 376 | 115 |
| .ru on .ru | 285 | 67 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Socket.IO or web-vitals?
web-vitals is on more sites: 25,534 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 2.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Socket.IO and web-vitals together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Socket.IO or web-vitals as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.