Join the waitlist

Home / Technologies / Socket.IO vs Web Components Polyfills

Socket.IO vs Web Components Polyfills: who uses which

Web Components Polyfills is on more sites: 44,489 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 4.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.

Where each one is used

DomainSocket.IOWeb Components Polyfills
.com on .com4,7487,098
.pl in Poland4910,381
.de in Germany1379,100
.org on .org3762,120
.ru on .ru2851,395
.it in Italy861,192
.ch in Switzerland251,235
.nl in the Netherlands461,136

3 sites run both at once.

Questions

Which is more popular, Socket.IO or Web Components Polyfills?

Web Components Polyfills is on more sites: 44,489 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 4.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.

Do sites use Socket.IO and Web Components Polyfills together?

3 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.

Want the whole list?

Join the waitlist to download every site using Socket.IO or Web Components Polyfills as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.

Join the waitlist