Home / Technologies / SolidJS vs Turbolinks
SolidJS vs Turbolinks: who uses which
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 1,070 for SolidJS, about 30.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | SolidJS | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 408 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 27 | 2,993 |
| .de in Germany | 32 | 816 |
| .net on .net | 22 | 757 |
| .ru on .ru | 9 | 740 |
| .fm on .fm | 0 | 643 |
| .jp in Japan | 13 | 622 |
| .io on .io | 27 | 604 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, SolidJS or Turbolinks?
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 1,070 for SolidJS, about 30.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use SolidJS and Turbolinks together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using SolidJS or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.