Home / Technologies / Sortable vs vanilla-lazyload
Sortable vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 12,964 for Sortable, about 3.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Sortable | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 5,489 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 485 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 335 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 325 | 954 |
| .de in Germany | 373 | 885 |
| .uk in the UK | 162 | 957 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 186 | 841 |
| .fr in France | 121 | 740 |
64 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Sortable or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 12,964 for Sortable, about 3.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Sortable and vanilla-lazyload together?
64 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Sortable or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.