Home / Technologies / Sphinx vs WP Fastest Cache
Sphinx vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 9,969 for Sphinx, about 30.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Sphinx | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,233 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 147 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 73 | 13,724 |
| .org on .org | 1,379 | 8,230 |
| .it in Italy | 20 | 9,399 |
| .ru on .ru | 42 | 7,771 |
| .pl in Poland | 13 | 7,433 |
| .net on .net | 200 | 6,735 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Sphinx or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 9,969 for Sphinx, about 30.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Sphinx and WP Fastest Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Sphinx or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.