Home / Technologies / Sphinx vs WP Super Cache
Sphinx vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 9,969 for Sphinx, about 29.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Sphinx | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,233 | 103,355 |
| .de in Germany | 147 | 21,667 |
| .fr in France | 73 | 17,086 |
| .org on .org | 1,379 | 14,864 |
| .ru on .ru | 42 | 12,192 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 39 | 12,193 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 26 | 6,885 |
| .net on .net | 200 | 6,694 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Sphinx or WP Super Cache?
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 9,969 for Sphinx, about 29.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Sphinx and WP Super Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Sphinx or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.