Home / Technologies / Substack vs WP Fastest Cache
Substack vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 72,038 for Substack, about 4.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Substack | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 63,748 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 80 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 183 | 13,724 |
| .org on .org | 1,435 | 8,230 |
| .it in Italy | 234 | 9,399 |
| .ru on .ru | 2 | 7,771 |
| .pl in Poland | 34 | 7,433 |
| .net on .net | 592 | 6,735 |
64 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Substack or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 72,038 for Substack, about 4.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Substack and WP Fastest Cache together?
64 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Substack or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.