Home / Technologies / Textpattern vs WP Super Cache
Textpattern vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,331 against 320 for Textpattern, about 907.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Textpattern | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 86 | 103,356 |
| .de in Germany | 62 | 21,667 |
| .fr in France | 2 | 17,086 |
| .org on .org | 27 | 14,864 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 10 | 12,193 |
| .ru on .ru | 5 | 12,192 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 11 | 6,885 |
| .net on .net | 22 | 6,694 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Textpattern or WP Super Cache?
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,331 against 320 for Textpattern, about 907.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Textpattern and WP Super Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using Textpattern or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.