Home / Technologies / Three.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Three.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 25,096 for Three.js, about 1.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Three.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 11,782 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 483 | 3,400 |
| .de in Germany | 1,393 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 677 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 550 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 375 | 957 |
| .fr in France | 490 | 740 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 279 | 841 |
30 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Three.js or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 25,096 for Three.js, about 1.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Three.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
30 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Three.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.