Home / Technologies / TinyMCE vs vanilla-lazyload
TinyMCE vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
TinyMCE is on more sites: 59,740 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | TinyMCE | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 22,826 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 4,345 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 3,591 | 986 |
| .ru on .ru | 1,140 | 3,400 |
| .net on .net | 1,638 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,496 | 957 |
| .fr in France | 1,693 | 740 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1,418 | 841 |
65 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, TinyMCE or vanilla-lazyload?
TinyMCE is on more sites: 59,740 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use TinyMCE and vanilla-lazyload together?
65 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using TinyMCE or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.