Home / Technologies / Turbolinks vs Typed.js
Turbolinks vs Typed.js: who uses which
Typed.js is on more sites: 84,213 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 2.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Turbolinks | Typed.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 16,528 | 35,154 |
| .org on .org | 2,993 | 3,114 |
| .de in Germany | 816 | 4,852 |
| .ru on .ru | 740 | 2,595 |
| .fr in France | 352 | 2,606 |
| .pl in Poland | 208 | 2,298 |
| .it in Italy | 160 | 2,224 |
| .uk in the UK | 444 | 1,884 |
16 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Turbolinks or Typed.js?
Typed.js is on more sites: 84,213 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 2.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Turbolinks and Typed.js together?
16 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Turbolinks or Typed.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.