Home / Technologies / Typed.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Typed.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Typed.js is on more sites: 84,213 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Typed.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 35,154 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,595 | 3,400 |
| .de in Germany | 4,852 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 3,114 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 2,606 | 740 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,884 | 957 |
| .pl in Poland | 2,298 | 456 |
| .it in Italy | 2,224 | 504 |
350 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Typed.js or vanilla-lazyload?
Typed.js is on more sites: 84,213 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Typed.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
350 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Typed.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.