Home / Technologies / Underscore.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Underscore.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 27.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Underscore.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 529,209 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 73,489 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 55,195 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 36,310 | 740 |
| .it in Italy | 35,400 | 504 |
| .uk in the UK | 34,026 | 957 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 25,391 | 841 |
| .pl in Poland | 23,784 | 456 |
3,487 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Underscore.js or vanilla-lazyload?
Underscore.js is on more sites: 1,226,291 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 27.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Underscore.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
3,487 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Underscore.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.