Home / Technologies / vanilla-lazyload vs VenoBox
vanilla-lazyload vs VenoBox: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 42,064 for VenoBox, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | vanilla-lazyload | VenoBox |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,712 | 21,015 |
| .ru on .ru | 3,400 | 557 |
| .org on .org | 986 | 1,483 |
| .de in Germany | 885 | 1,322 |
| .uk in the UK | 957 | 1,122 |
| .net on .net | 954 | 774 |
| .it in Italy | 504 | 1,081 |
| .fr in France | 740 | 569 |
34 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, vanilla-lazyload or VenoBox?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 42,064 for VenoBox, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use vanilla-lazyload and VenoBox together?
34 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using vanilla-lazyload or VenoBox as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.