Home / Technologies / vanilla-lazyload vs Vite
vanilla-lazyload vs Vite: who uses which
Vite is on more sites: 525,602 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 11.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | vanilla-lazyload | Vite |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,712 | 259,795 |
| .org on .org | 986 | 26,852 |
| .net on .net | 954 | 13,528 |
| .app on .app | 46 | 14,396 |
| .uk in the UK | 957 | 10,555 |
| .de in Germany | 885 | 10,035 |
| .br in Brazil | 303 | 10,575 |
| .ai on .ai | 48 | 9,202 |
44 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, vanilla-lazyload or Vite?
Vite is on more sites: 525,602 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 11.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use vanilla-lazyload and Vite together?
44 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using vanilla-lazyload or Vite as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.