Home / Technologies / vanilla-lazyload vs web-vitals
vanilla-lazyload vs web-vitals: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 1.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | vanilla-lazyload | web-vitals |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,712 | 6,745 |
| .br in Brazil | 303 | 7,224 |
| .ar in Argentina | 115 | 6,933 |
| .ru on .ru | 3,400 | 67 |
| .de in Germany | 885 | 593 |
| .uk in the UK | 957 | 198 |
| .net on .net | 954 | 177 |
| .org on .org | 986 | 115 |
7 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, vanilla-lazyload or web-vitals?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 1.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use vanilla-lazyload and web-vitals together?
7 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using vanilla-lazyload or web-vitals as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.