Home / Technologies / vanilla-lazyload vs Webpack
vanilla-lazyload vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 61.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | vanilla-lazyload | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,712 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 986 | 169,050 |
| .uk in the UK | 957 | 120,575 |
| .de in Germany | 885 | 66,965 |
| .net on .net | 954 | 66,266 |
| .au in Australia | 471 | 52,797 |
| .ca in Canada | 779 | 46,584 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 217 | 42,006 |
84 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, vanilla-lazyload or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 61.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use vanilla-lazyload and Webpack together?
84 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using vanilla-lazyload or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.