Home / Technologies / vanilla-lazyload vs WOW.js
vanilla-lazyload vs WOW.js: who uses which
WOW.js is on more sites: 722,189 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 16.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | vanilla-lazyload | WOW.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,712 | 375,158 |
| .cn on .cn | 243 | 29,107 |
| .org on .org | 986 | 23,989 |
| .de in Germany | 885 | 22,484 |
| .net on .net | 954 | 18,441 |
| .ru on .ru | 3,400 | 15,888 |
| .uk in the UK | 957 | 13,278 |
| .it in Italy | 504 | 13,575 |
1,353 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, vanilla-lazyload or WOW.js?
WOW.js is on more sites: 722,189 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 16.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use vanilla-lazyload and WOW.js together?
1,353 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using vanilla-lazyload or WOW.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.