Home / Technologies / web-vitals vs Webpack
web-vitals vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 108.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | web-vitals | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 6,745 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 115 | 169,050 |
| .uk in the UK | 198 | 120,575 |
| .de in Germany | 593 | 66,965 |
| .net on .net | 177 | 66,266 |
| .au in Australia | 195 | 52,797 |
| .br in Brazil | 7,224 | 40,740 |
| .ca in Canada | 76 | 46,584 |
373 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, web-vitals or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 108.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use web-vitals and Webpack together?
373 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using web-vitals or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.