Home / Technologies / WoodMart vs WP Fastest Cache
WoodMart vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 107,332 for WoodMart, about 2.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | WoodMart | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 46,631 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 7,891 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 1,041 | 13,724 |
| .ru on .ru | 4,622 | 7,771 |
| .it in Italy | 2,042 | 9,399 |
| .org on .org | 1,086 | 8,230 |
| .pl in Poland | 1,559 | 7,433 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,517 | 6,855 |
2,952 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, WoodMart or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache is on more sites: 299,890 against 107,332 for WoodMart, about 2.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use WoodMart and WP Fastest Cache together?
2,952 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using WoodMart or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.